Joseph Fiscella: Week 4 at Suffolk County Vector Control
This past week was focused on fish surveillance in the various marsh sites we are responsible for. While not direct vectors for disease transmission, the fish populations serve as an important indicator for the mosquito populations, since the fish consume mosquito larvae. Additionally, the number of fish we sample might influence the amount of chemical pesticide that is sprayed, since the fish can be a means of biological control. At each marsh site, we set eight fish traps. I provided a picture of what the traps we use look like below. The fish swim into the larger opening in the center of the cone. We take our sample from the traps 24 hours after we set the traps.
For all of the fish we collect, we measure them from head to tail and identify the species. Additionally, we note how many fish are alive/dead; unfortunately, the collection of fish in the traps creates a low oxygen environment, so it is common for some fish to be dead at the time of sampling. The vast majority of the fish we sampled were Fundulus heteroclitus, a small killfish known as mummichog, which is pictured below. I wasn't able to take any pictures out in the marsh this week just because of how messy the sampling was; depending on the tides, some of the traps were set in muddy areas. In addition to the fish, we also collected some crabs, shrimp, and eels. Beyond the species present, we also recorded the salinity of the water at each trap. Overall, this week was very interesting and a productive pause from the typical mosquito/tick surveillance.
Comments
Post a Comment